Jock wrote:Actually there are people who challenge this definition. They have the organs but chromosomes say the opposite. So which are they?
I would think it is logical to go with the side that manifest itself in the reproductive organs.
Jock wrote:But your definition is for one purpose, theirs is for a different one.
My definition is for the same purpose...sports competition. If she has female reproductive organs and she's not allowed to compete with women because their tests say she is male, then will she be allowed to compete against men...or would there still be some controversy with that??
